Civil Rights Movement: How Dare You Compare!
March 28, 2015 at 1:24 am 4 comments
I’ve often seen the Civil Rights movement of the 1950’s and 60’s held up in a sort of strange but lofty isolation from other social justice movements, to the point where people almost seem to regard it as the only real legit social movement to which all others look silly and petty in comparison and Martin Luther King Jr. is the Best Activist Leader Ever, and the whole thing including him as prophet was anointed and blessed by God. I’ve seen this portrayal by everyone from Black men and women to both white liberals and conservatives. Along with this ideology is the belief that racism is the worst form of oppression, and anyone who tries to compare it with other forms of oppression or their own movement with The Movement, is being racist and appropriating from Black people.
It’s hard to articulate exactly where I’ve seen this, though I think it was a more common tactic in the earlier 2000s and 1990s. As I’ve read and listened to more writing and speeches by women and queer people of color, in particular I have come to realize the disrespectful attitudes white feminists and white GLBTQ movement activists have had towards communities of color and their struggles. When we hear this narrative, we need to question who is promoting it and who is framing it, and what is their agenda? Who are they trying to win over or alienate? Likewise, women, queer and disabled people of color are in the strongest positions to critique these ideas- they can speak from their own experiences about how racism is similar and different from other types of oppression. The view of MLK as the Best Leader the Black Community Will Ever Have is very self-defeating and oversimplified. He was a great man surely, but like any man he was flawed. He is given way too much credit while many women such as Ella Baker, and Bayard Rustin, a gay man who was responsible for much of the organizing of the March on Washington, are all too often forgotten by historians. This is the case with *every social movement* or field of art or science for that matter. Each one has many people who played key roles, but were more introverted, too ill or disabled, or female, or queer, or radical to be in the spotlight, or did not have the means to access education or travel or media coverage. That’s why I really enjoy reaching into history and remembering those who have been forgotten as my activist ancestors.
Entry filed under: Feminism/Gender, GLBT, Race/Ethnicity. Tags: Civil Rights, comparisons.
1.
lassy | March 28, 2015 at 1:29 am
Reblogged this on Will the real reality please stand up!.
2.
Amanda | March 28, 2015 at 2:09 am
This reminds me of how every single city seems to require a Martin Luther King Jr. Street. Or at least that’s how it seems around here. The small suburb I live in has one, all the major cities in Texas have one, I’ve even seen small towns out in the middle of nowhere with an MLK street.
I mean, MLK was great and all, but there were other civil rights leaders out there. I sometimes wonder if MLK has turned into the “acceptable” one, the non-controversial one that all these towns can name streets after, and then pat ourselves on the back and go, “yeah, racism is over, because look at this street we named after a black person!”
(Austin does have a Cesar Chavez Street too, so I guess that’s something. There you go, Latinos, you get a street too!)
3.
caelesti | March 28, 2015 at 2:38 am
And typically it goes thru a traditionally Black neighborhood- especially as a PR move to say “sorry for ripping apart your neighborhood in the 70’s for Urban Renewal, Freeways and Other Progress ™ (or Latino in the case of Cesar Chavez) St. Paul where I live has both and MLK Blvd has dual names, so people who know it by the older name still know where they are.
4. Separate Worlds: Race, Disability and Sexuality | The Lefthander's Path | March 28, 2015 at 2:41 am
[…] reason I wrote the previous post is, I cannot say enough how important the concept of intersectionality is to me as a bisexual […]