Authenticity: What’s Traditional Anyway?

January 10, 2014 at 10:32 am 6 comments

One thing that seems to unite members of many religions as well as postmodern hipsters, is the search for authenticity. So as people debate over whether this or that custom, method of worship, holiday etc. is authentic or not, and to what degree, I think it best to take a step back and ask, what do we mean by “authentic”?

Many holiday customs that we think of as “traditional” for both Christian and Pagan holidays, we don’t have record of much beyond the Middle Ages. Pagans often make claims that this or that holiday custom was of Pagan origin, and meant such and such, but lot of this is conjecture. But does that really matter? It’s interesting, certainly to know the antiquity and origins of our practices and symbols, but you and your family (or coven/grove/kindred) think it means something, and you find out that it doesn’t, does that lose its meaning or power? No. The story behind it may change, the reason may change, the meaning may shift, but it’s still there. In fact the story of how you found out that the “traditional story” was wrong becomes a new part of your tradition! Such as my fiance’s great-grandmother claiming to be related to President Harrison, which they figured out was impossible.

Are we doing things we think are authentic for their own sake, or for their intrinsic meaning and relevance?
Take say, Latin Mass. Latin was the language that united the Roman Empire, and its cultural heir, the Catholic Church and later the language of the educated classes. After Latin’s influence had waned for centuries, the Vatican decided that Mass would be in local languages. Some people enjoy the rhythms and cadences of the Latin language, and they like to experience Mass spoken and sung in Latin. And so some churches still have Latin Mass. There were some people at the time of Vatican II that were upset about these changes simply because they were new.

Change is threatening. So is the unfamiliar. But we shouldn’t cling to things that aren’t relevant to our time and place out of insecurity. On the other hand, throwing out something just because it’s not modern and shiny is also spiritually immature. Be honest about the origins of your spiritual practices and beliefs, that gives you and your path more legitimacy than claiming false antiquity.
Remember, everything had to start somewhere.

Pagan Blog Project 2014

This post owes a lot of inspiration to this article by Gordon Cooper, and an interview with John Michael Greer on Deo’s Shadow Podcast (both of the Ancient Order of Druids in America) in which he discusses “authenticity vs. validity”.


Entry filed under: Concepts & Definitions, History. Tags: , , , , , .

Snow Queen, Snow Maiden Favorite “A” PBP Posts

6 Comments Add your own

  • 1. onyx1688  |  January 12, 2014 at 1:20 am

    im happy there are people who think this way – it can really ruin things when people start arguing about “your practice is bad because ancient x culture actually did it differently and you do it wrong”… jus because a practice or belief has not been around for many centuries does not mean its is wrong :3

  • 2. James Bulls  |  January 12, 2014 at 2:31 am

    Damn straight. I’m glad to hear that I’m not the only one who rolls his eyes when Pagans jump ship from one tradition to another in search of the elusive “most authentic” Paganism. It’s sort of race to the bottom: some of these folks are competing to see who can be more “native” than anybody else.

    “Well, I was a Wiccan, but then I started mixing it with Native American traditions, but that became so new-age so I quit that and became a shaman. You know, like from Brazil or something? But that turned so main-stream that now I’m, uh… studying the mystic ways of, uh… crap, gimme another native culture to appropriate!”

    I mean, if their goal is to be religiously stylish, then I suppose there’s nothing we can do to help them. But if their goal is to become accomplished or “mature” in a field, they could do that with anything if they just stuck with it and applied themselves.

  • 3. caelesti  |  January 17, 2014 at 12:57 am

    It also seems like they pick the most obscure cultures that there’s the least amount of info about so they can make stuff up. Like the “Etruscan Recon” I met. Of course, you could accuse us Celtic Pagans of that too.

  • 4. When the Gods Become Real | The Lefthander's Path  |  January 21, 2014 at 11:43 pm

    […] assumptions are false then their whole religion falls apart. Hence part of my reasoning in the Authenticity […]

  • 5. Pagan Blog Project Archive Post | The Lefthander's Path  |  January 4, 2015 at 10:19 am

    […] A- Authenticity January 10 […]

  • 6. “Breaking Tradition” is Redundant | The Lefthander's Path  |  September 14, 2018 at 8:53 pm

    […] Authenticity: What’s Traditional Anyway? […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


January 2014

Most Recent Posts

%d bloggers like this: